Mobile Logo in White

Measuring the Effect of Clinical Decision Support on Nursing EBP

Primary Author: Susan Cortez, RN, BSN, MBA/ HCM, PhD
Co-Principal Investigators/Collaborators: Nancy Wells RN, DNSc, PhD
Organization: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

 

 

 

Abstract

Purpose

The research purpose was to measure the effect of active Clinical Decision Support (CDS) on oncology nurses’ use of evidence-based interventions for symptom control.

Background

Rates of oncology nursing evidence-based practice range from 41 to 50%, due, in part, to lack of quick and easy access to evidence-based interventions during nurse-patient interaction. Clinical Decision Support embedded within the electronic documentation system may address this barrier.

Materials & Methods

This design was a longitudinal cluster randomized study with 2 oncology infusion clinics in the intervention group and 2 in the control group. The study intervention was active CDS, in the form of drop down boxes for 4 common symptoms – constipation, diarrhea, fatigue, and pain. Education sessions on the Oncology Nursing Society’s “Putting Evidence Into Practice” evidence-based interventions were offered for all nurses. The research outcome was adherence to evidence-based interventions, obtained using manual record review. The sample observations, pulled from the enterprise data warehouse (EDW), were documented interventions for cancer-related symptoms. Two hundred observations were pulled at baseline, post-education, and post-intervention yielding a total sample of 600. Mixed model linear statistical analysis was used to test the difference in use of evidence-based interventions between the intervention and control groups for each sample cycle.

Results

Chai Square analysis showed no statistically significant differences between groups on nursing education or years of clinical experience (p > 0.05). The average rate of intervention adherence at baseline was 27% across both groups. After education, the average rate increased to 36.5% and then decreased to 26% following the CDS intervention. The mixed model analysis showed no interaction between the groups and sample cycle (F(df=2,593)= 1.37, p= .26), suggesting active CDS did not improve use of evidence-based interventions.

Conclusion

Active CDS did not alter the nurse’s use of evidence-based interventions compared to controls. Further investigation of active CDS with additional interactive strategies is warranted.

 

Bibliography

  • American Nurses Association. (2013). Nursing World: Professional Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ThePracticeofProfessional...
  • American Nurses Credentialing Center. (2011). ANCC Magnet Recognition Program. Retrieved from http://www.nursecredentialing.org/Magnet.aspx
  • Ash, J. S., Sitting, D. F., Guappone, K., Dykstra, R. H., Richardson, J., Wright, A.,...Middleton, B. (2012). Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12(6), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-6
  • Berner, E. S. (2009). Clinical Decision Support Systems: State of the Art (09-0069-EF). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Brokel, J. (2009, September-October). Infusing clinical decision support interventions into electronic health records. Urologic Nursing, 29(5), 345-353.
  • Cooke, L., Smith-Idell, C., Dean, G., Gemmill, R., Steingass, S., Sun, V., & Grant, M. (2004). Research to practice: A practical program to enhance the use of evidence-based practice at the unit level. Oncology Nursing Forum, 31(4), 825-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/04.ONF.825-832
  • Gorelick, C. S. (2010). Personal digital assistants: Their influence on clinical decision-making and the influence of evidence-based practice in baccalaureate nursing students (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.apollolibrary.com/docview/250777184/1...
  • Halm, M. A. (2010, July). Inside looking in or inside looking out? How leaders shape cultures equipped for evidence-based practice. American Journal of Critical Care, 19(4), 375-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2010627
  • Health Information Technology for Economical and Clinical Health Act, 74 Federal Register § 45 CFR Part 160 (2009).
  • Institute of Medicine. (1999 November). Shaping the Future for Health. To Err is human: Building A safer Health System (0309068371). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Institute of Medicine. (2004). Keeping patients safe: Transforming the work environment of nurses. Retrieved from Institute of Medicine Advising the Nation Improving Health: http://iom.edu/Reports/2003/Keeping-Patients-.aspx
  • Institute of Medicine. (2012). Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology Board on Health Care Services (2012007111). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Newhouse, R. P. (2007). Creating infrastructure supportive of evidence-based nursing practice: Leadership strategies. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(1), 21-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00075.x
  • Oncology Nursing Society. (2009). ONS PEP: Putting evidence into practice. Retrieved from http://www.ons.org/Research/PEP
  • Osheroff, J., A., Teich, J., M., Middleton, B., F., Steen, E., B., Wright., A., Detmer, D., E. (2006). A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. AMIA Presentation.
  • Osheroff, J., A. (2010, September 10). Structuring care recommendations for clinical decision support. AHRQ Project Update for CDS Federal Collaboratory.
  • Poe, S. S., & White, K. M. (2010). Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Implementation and Translation. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Thea Tau international.
  • Saca-Hazboun, H. (2009, April). Putting evidence into practice: Outcomes of using ONS PEP resources. ONS Connect, 8-11. Retrieved from http://www.onsconnect.org/2012/11
  • Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. C., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996, 13 January). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91850-7

© Improvement Science Research Network, 2012

The ISRN published this as received and with permission from the author(s).