Mobile Logo in White

Tight Glycemic Control in Non-Critically Ill Patients

Principal Investigator: Gita Wasan Patel, PharmD
Co-Principal Investigator/Collaborator: Nicki S. Roderman (Presenter)
Organization: Medical Center of Plano

Abstract

Problem

Blood glucose control in non-critically ill patients is inconsistent.

Evidence

Hyperglycemia is associated with an increased length of stay, cardiovascular insult, and delay in infection resolution among other adverse events. There is a shortage of evidence evaluating subcutaneous tight glycemic control algorithms and their rate of hypoglycemia.

Strategy

This study examined the effect of sliding scale insulin (SS) versus a subcutaneous tight glycemic control (TC) protocol on blood sugars (BS) of patients that were not critically ill. The target BS range was 80–150 mg/dL.

Practice Change

IRB-approved, retrospective analysis was done on SS patients from March through May of 2006 and TC patients from October through December of 2006 all of whom were on the respective regimens for a minimum of three days. SS patients that received oral hypoglycemics or any insulin other than regular or insulin aspart were excluded. TC patients that received oral hypoglycemics or any insulin other than insulin glargine with regular or insulin aspart were excluded.

Evaluation

Demographics, co-morbidities, and BS were examined.

Results

Sixty-nine SS patients and seventy TC patients met criteria. Demographics, percentage of diabetic patients, co-morbidities, and length of therapy were statistically similar. The mean BS was 168.6 mg/dL in SS patients and 162.1 mg/dL for TC patients (p=0.004). For SS patients, 0.6% of the BS were 0–60 versus 1.7% for TCI. A BS of 61–79 mg/dL was achieved in 1.6% of SS and 5.4% of TCI BS. In the SS group, 41.6% of the BS were in the target range of 80–150 mg/dL versus 45.4% of the BS in the TCI group (p<0.0001). Hyperglycemia (BS >150) was found in 56.3% of the SS BS versus 47.5% of the TCI BS (p<0.0001).

Recommendations

The TC algorithm for non-ICU patients was more effective and just as safe as SS.

Bibliography

  • Centers for Disease Control Diabetes Program-Publications and Products. National Diabetics Fact Sheet. Available at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/DDTSTRS/default.aspx. Accessed January 9, 2008.
  • Centers for Disease Control Diabetes Program-Publications and Products. Diabetes Data and Trends. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/dmany/fig1.htm. Accessed January 9, 2008.
  • Centers for Disease Control Diabetes Program-Publications and Products. Diabetes Data and Trends. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/statistics/dmany/fig2.htm. Accessed January 9, 2008.
  • Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N, You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of in-hospital mortality in patients with undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87: 978–982.
  • Levetan CS, Passaro M, Jablonski K, Kass M, Ratner RE. Unrecognized diabetes among hospitalized patients. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 246–249.
  • Joshi N, Caputo GM, Weitekamp MR, Karchmer AW Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 1906–1912. Comment in N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 895–896.
  • Pickkers P, Hoedemaekers A, Netea MG, et al. Hypothesis: normalization of cytokine dysbalance explains the favourable effects of strict glucose regulation in the critically ill. Neth J Med. 2004; 62: 143–150.
  • Moghissi ES, Hirsch IB. Hospital management of diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2005; 34: 99–116.
  • Wautier JL, Boulanger E, Wautier MP. Postprandial hyperglycemia alters inflammatory and hemostatic parameters. Diabetes Metab. 2006; 32 (Spec No 2): 2S34–2S36.
  • American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2007. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30 (suppl 1): S4–S41.
  • van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F. et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 1359–1367.
  • van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the medical ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 449–461.